It is unfortunate that some members of Congress have inserted a provision in the federal appropriations bill seeking to derail implementation of lighting efficiency standards enacted in 2007 and signed by then-President Bush. Contrary to misinformation being spread by some lamp standard opponents, the standards do not ban incandescent lamps, but merely require incandescent lamps to be more efficient. Five manufacturers are now producing and selling efficient incandescent bulbs that meet the standards. With the new budget provision, the law is still in effect, but the Department of Energy cannot spend money to enforce it. Law-abiding companies will follow the law. Less scrupulous companies will take advantage of the lack of enforcement, selling products that waste energy and increase energy costs for consumers. If many manufacturers take advantage of the lack of enforcement, recent investments that these five manufacturers have made to produce efficient lamps could be undermined. Public opinion polls show that the standards continue to have broad support —two-thirds of Americans support the lighting standard (61% call it a good law), and five-sixths (84%) are satisfied or very satisfied with the alternative bulbs, according to a USA Today/Gallup poll (February 2011). We hope that as more and more consumers use the improved-efficiency incandescent bulbs and discover that fears about the standards are unjustified, pressure to extend the enforcement moratorium will decline.
Comments
Light Bulb Woes
When will a light bulb be designed for outdoor neighborhoods that really works to direct the light to shine down?
Our neighborhoods are over lit and over run with bad lighting. When you consider that the light bulb was only invented in 1880 - our planet today is lit up like a Christmas Tree - it literally glows from space. Lighting is out of control. Many movements have sprung up to reclaim the night and with that issues of safety, health, the monetary waste, environmental pollution that goes with an over-lit world not to mention we are the first humans in the history of the human race to not see the splendor of the heavens because the night sky is so light polluted.
We need to make light bulbs available to the general public that direct the light to shine DOWN rather than indiscriminately in every direction. The Philips 'Director' bulb is a good start but not enough. I believe that the design of the light bulb needs a distinct 'lip' built in to act as a shield thereby increasing the shielding ability of the design. Has anyone made such a design? If not why not?
**** http://www.darksky.org/assets/documents/PG3-residential-lighting.pdf
**** http://www.lethbridgeastronomysociety.ca/index.php/light-pollution
Reducing Light Pollution
Rena Woss' comment talks about light pollution. This is primarily an issue with lighting fixture design, not bulb design. Fixtures are available from multiple manufacturers that aim most of the light down with only limited "uplight". New LED fixtures tend to be particularly good in this regard. For example, next week new LED lighting on the National Mall in Washington, DC will be unveiled.