Friday's NY Times had a story on the challenges facing the manufacturing sector.
Not a pretty picture.
Friday's NY Times had a story on the challenges facing the manufacturing sector.
Not a pretty picture.
In February 2009, Congress passed and the President signed an economic stimulus package estimated to cost $787 billion over two years. Below we summarize provisions related to energy efficiency. Copies of the legislation and some other details are available from the federal government at www.recovery.gov.
The stimulus package provides approximately $20 billion specifically for energy efficiency as follows:
In addition, further funds will go to a variety of projects that relate to energy efficiency or a portion of which will go for energy efficiency:
There are also a variety of changes and enhancements to existing federal energy efficiency tax incentives. See www.energytaxincentives.org for more information.
Note: A large proportion of the stimulus funds related to energy efficiency will go to state and municipalities, each of which will handle program development and design individually.
Not many small to medium-sized manufacturers can afford to employ someone to oversee the energy or environmental aspects of their day-to-day operations. Historically, energy has been too small a percentage of the overall costs of manufacturing operations to warrant even a part-time person to address energy efficiency. As we move toward higher costs for energy resources and the need for greater attention to this aspect of the manufacturing process, the question becomes how we best marshal our existing capabilities to accomplish greater energy efficiency for manufacturers.
One effort that has proven effective is to develop a manufacturers’ mentoring network. By fostering collaboration among larger industrial manufacturers and smaller manufacturers, a state or region can develop a technical and informational resource network. A state energy program can support a mentoring network by supplying administrative leadership and resources to maintain it over time. Matching identified needs with resources can be the work of a state program as well. Many ideas and actions will flow from these one-on-one mentoring discussions and state energy offices should capture and share them through documentation and distribution.
The Maine Department of Environmental Protection has developed a program joining “Environmental Leaders” to share their sustainability and smart growth goals with the greater Maine business community. The program establishes a thorough set of smart production pathways and metrics, such as the certification of an environmental management system, to measure a business’s environmental and economic sustainability performance. The mentoring network is a crucial piece of the program that allows Environmental Leaders to share methods of energy- and resource-efficient production and experiences implementing innovative technologies with smaller businesses.
Networks should include a full range of manufacturing companies since efficiency gains are often found in processes that work across sectors like steam and compressed air systems. Energy offices can organize regular meetings with an invited speaker on a given topic or a short training session that prompts a discussion on a particular aspect of the manufacturing process. A session on compressed air efficiency can lead to a discussion among participants that might further lead to offers from larger operations to support the smaller operations in finding greater efficiencies.
Mentoring networks serve the needs of the small to medium-sized manufacturing community and pay off with large dividends – it can save jobs and improve the viability of U.S. manufacturing, which is sorely needed and overdue.
FMI on Manufacturing Networks and Maine’s Environmental Leaders Program, contact Julie Churchill: 207-287-7881, or visit the website.
FlexTech provides technical assistance for facility owners to make informed energy decisions. The service is provided to a full range of non-residential customers by consulting engineers under contract with NYSERDA, who perform objective, individualized energy audits and feasibility studies. Consulting engineers are chosen for each project based on matching expertise with specific facility characteristics and needs (e.g., for industrial projects, engineers are chosen with expertise in the relevant industry). The tailored analyses and recommendations have lead 60% of FlexTech customers to implement energy efficiency measures within 18 months of their study. The program boasts substantial success: $200 million worth of energy improvements installed by customers that annually save 1.8 million of MMBtu of fossil fuels and 290 GWh of electricity, and reduce peak demand by 54 MW. Evaluations show that every dollar spent by FlexTech leverages a $17 investment by customers on energy efficiency improvements and $5 in net energy bill savings by customers.
FlexTech seeks quality consultants every 3 years through an RFP to participate in the program. A program like FlexTech requires substantial collaboration between the state energy office and consultants in order to maintain quality services. Collaboration begins with the energy office reviewing consultants’ initial studies and continues through reviewing final reports. The relationship benefits both parties by improving the energy performance of facilities and the business of local contractors and energy service providers. The program is a good example of flexible, customer-friendly government.
For more information on FlexTech, contact Mark Gundrum: 518-862-1090 ext. 3256, or visit the website
Read about more exemplary commercial/industrial retrofit programs: ACEEE’s Compendium of Champions