2004 ACEEE
Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings
PowerPlay
The Energy Efficiency Game
No Surprise:
PowerPlay Reveals Winners and Losers in the Energy Markets
August 26, 2004
PACIFIC GROVE, CALIFORNIA
Participants in this year's ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency got a real-time
glimpse into the dynamics of future electricity markets. The decisions
they made as part of a computer-facilitated gaming exercise provided
insights into how markets and technology choices might shape future
electricity prices, demand, and environmental impacts.
Almost 60 participants split into eleven groups representing a
diverse set of households, technology producers and utilities. They
invested, negotiated, pressured and even bribed a little through
15 years of market interactions. Their decisions shaped technology
investments and energy purchases on both the demand and supply side.
The eleven groups had to maximize profits and aspects of consumer
satisfaction like environmental quality in constantly updated market
conditions that were determined by the players' own actions.
After 15 years of hectic interactions and decisions, the world
changed in the following ways:
- The cooperative
pursuit of efficiency by consumers and manufacturers of efficient
equipment drove utility and electric generator profits down while
the overall profits for high-end, energy efficient product lines
increased. The summer study participants probably betrayed their
bias by the overwhelming drive to increase efficiency regardless
of their supposed group interests. This behavior also created
significant volatility in the market.
- While electricity
prices steadily increased, there was a five-year lag before electricity
demand began to drop. Despite the lower demand for electricity,
carbon emissions remained roughly unchanged as the utilities lost
revenues on renewable resources and had to substitute more fossil
fuel technologies in the generation mix.
- One of
the three Low-Income Household groups lost big time while the
remaining five households (two low-income and three high income)
either stayed the same or actually increased their overall well-being.
PowerPlay, the computer-facilitated game through which
the groups exchanged information, was developed at the University
of Maryland, College Park, with support by the US EPA and International
Energy Agency (IEA). While providing participants in PowerPlay
the real-life experience of making decisions about energy efficiency,
the game also offers insights to researchers on how firm and household
decisions change under changing technological and market conditions.
"This is a new and different way of understanding dynamic price
elasticities that will inform energy modeling and policy making"
says John 'Skip" Laitner of EPA. Alan Meier of IEA adds: "This was
an exceptional opportunity to grasp the underlying reasons for strange
market dynamics, and all their ripple effects, in energy efficiency
markets."
For more information, please contact University of Maryland Professor Matthias Ruth.
Top of Page
|