Volume 8: Measurement and Evaluation

Full Site
Publications

Volume 8: Measurement and Evaluation

Panel 8 Overview 8.ix
Alan F. Destribats and Eric Hirst

Future Directions: Integrated Resource Planning 8.1
Douglas C. Bauer, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Joseph H. Eto, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory

Setting Priorities for Utility Investment in Cost-Effective DSM 8.17
Joseph M. Chaisson and Susan E. Coakley, Conservation Law Foundation

Gaining Momentum or Running Out of Steam? Utility Shareholder Incentive
Mechanisms--Past, Present, and Future 8.23
John H. Chamberlin, Julia B. Brown and Michael W. Reid, Barakat and
Chamberlin, Inc.

Estimating Marginal Gas Costs: A Case Study 8.33
Carol Etter and Frank Stern, RCG/Hagler, Bailly, Inc.

DSM Planning: Is It Any Different the Second Time Around? 8.41
Ahmad Faruqui, Susan S. Shaffer, Ellen Rubinstein, and Dana Toulson,
Barakat and Chamberlin, Inc.
Mark S. Kumm, Potomac Electric Power Company

Incorporating Lessons Learned into Demand-Side Bidding 8.51
Jane L. Finleon, Kelly A. Triplett and Bruce C. Peterson, Public Service
Company of Colorado

The Politics of Fuel Switching: A Vermont Case Study 8.59
Joan F. Gamble, Central Vermont Public Service Corporation
Michael J. Weedall, Green Mountain Power Corporation

Integrated Resource Planning at Gas Utilities: A Review of Initial Efforts 8.67
Charles A. Goldman, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
Mary Ellen F. Hopkins, The Fleming Group

Fuel Switching Programs in Vermont: Issues and Experiences 8.79
L. Blair Hamilton, Vermont Energy Investment Corporation
Lewis Milford, Conservation Law Foundation
Scudder Parker and William Steinhurst, Vermont Department of Public Service

Definitions and Tradeoffs: Cost-Effectiveness of Utility DSM Programs 8.89
Eric Hirst, Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Integrating Market Processes into Utility Resource Planning 8.99
Edward P. Kahn, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory

Exporting Integrated Resource Planning to Less-Developed and Post-Communist
Countries 8.111
Marc R. Ledbetter, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy
David R. Wolcott, RCG/Hagler, Bailly, Inc.
Mark J. Cherniack, International Institute for Energy Conservation
Carl Pechman, New York State Department of Public Service

Should Utility Shareholders Earn Incentives from DSM Bidding Programs? 8.119
David W. Lui, Synergic Resources Corporation

The Development of a Local Electric Energy Efficiency Economic Impact Model
for Use in Integrated Resource Planning 8.127
Lori Megdal and Hasan Rammaha, City of Austin

Can Greed, Accuracy and Fairness be Mixed for the Public Good? The Case of the
California Shareholder Incentive Experiment for Utility DSM Programs 8.135
Michael Messenger, California Energy Commission

The Context and Organization of Demand-Side Management Collaboratives:
An Overview 8.141
Martin Schweitzer, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Jonathan Raab, Consultant

Residential Fuel Substitution in Integrated Resource Planning: An Economic Analysis 8.151
Mark E. Thompson and Conrad Eustis, Portland General Electric Company

The Collaborative Planning Process in Vermont: What We Could Have Done Better 8.161
Michael J. Weedall, Green Mountain Power Corporation
Joan F. Gamble, Central Vermont Public Service Corporation

Optimal Expansion of Energy Efficiency Programs: Examples 8.167
Allen F. Wilson and Villamor Gamponia, Seattle City Light
Benjamin F. Hobbs, Case Western Reserve University

Moving Beyond Demand-Side Bidding: A More Constructive Role for Energy
Service Companies 8.177
David R. Wolcott, RCG/Hagler, Bailly, Inc.
Charles A. Goldman, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory

Anatomy of a Collaborative (Times 15) 8.187
Patrick Wolfe, Nancy Benner and Diana Bjornskov, Portland Energy
Conservation, Inc.

Electric Marketing and Energy Efficiency: What Path for Shareholder Value? 8.197
Eric Woychik, Craig McDonald and Bob Redlinger, Synergic Resources
Corporation

Back to: 1992 Summer Study