Volume 6: Policy

Full Site
Publications

Volume 6: Policy

Environmental Implications Associated with Integrated Resource Planning by Public
Utilities in the Western United States 6.1
Michael C. Baechler, Gordon S. Haber, Janet N. Cothran, and M. Maureen
Hand, Pacific Northwest Laboratory

Potential Issues and Problems in Using DSM Programs to Address the Electric
Power Demand Crisis in Ghana (West Africa) 6.11
Kofi Berko, Jr., University of Delaware

Energy-Efficiency Improvements and Remaining Opportunities in the DOE Low-
Income Weatherization Program 6.19
Linda G. Berry and Marilyn A. Brown, Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Utility-Sponsored Low-Income Weatherization as a DSM Option 6.29
G. Chandrasekar, Young-Doo Wang, John Byrne, and Kyunghee Ham,
University of Delaware

Models of Public and Private Investment in Energy Efficiency for Low-Income
Housing 6.39
Roger D. Colton, Fisher, Sheehan & Colton
Beth Sachs, Vermont Energy Investment Corporation
Janice DeBarros, Citizens Conservation Corporation

Minimum Cost Model Energy Code Envelope Requirements 6.47
Craig C. Conner and Robert G. Lucas, Pacific Northwest Laboratory
Stephen J. Turchen, U.S. Department of Energy

Lighting Code Compliance in New Small Commercial Construction in Minnesota 6.59
Laurie A. Czeschin, Michael W. Sachi, Martha J. Hewett, David D.
Vavricka, and Patrick McKellips, Center for Energy and Environment

Commercial Building Code Development in Australia 6.67
Charles Eley and John Kennedy, Eley Associates
Linton Parker, SRC Australia
Ian Porter, Department of Energy and Minerals

Exporting Integrated Resource Planning to Poland 6.81
Wallace R. Gibson, Northwest Power Planning Council
Ewaryst Hille, Polish Foundation for Energy Efficiency (FEWE)

Market Transformations to Super Efficient Products: The Emergence of Partnership
Approaches 6.91
David B. Goldstein, Natural Resources Defense Council

DSM and Deregulation: Experiences from Norway 6.101
Hans Otto Haaland, The Norwegian Federation of Energy Utilities
Harold Wilhite, Ressurskonsult (Oslo), Jyukankyo Research Institute (Tokyo)

Gas Collaborative Issues in Maryland: Implementation of Gas Demand-Side
Management (Gas Conservation) Programs by Local Gas Distribution Companies
Subject to the Jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission of Maryland 6.111
Mary Ellen Fitzpatrick Hopkins, Battelle, Pacific Northwest Laboratories
Henry Einhorn, Maryland Public Service Commission

Trends in IRP Development--Where Are We Heading 6.119
Mary C. Lang and Juanita M. Haydel, ICF Resources Incorporated

Thomas A. Edison Will Finally Smile: The Pricing of Energy Services, Not
Kilowatt-Hours 6.127
William LeBlanc, Barakat & Chamberlin, Inc.

The Washington State Non-Residential Energy Code: A New Model Process
for Code Development 6.139
Kevin Madison, Utility Code Group
Tony J. Usibelli, Washington State Energy Office
Jeffrey P. Harris, Northwest Power Planning Council

How Well is Our Energy Code Working? An Evaluation of the Tacoma, Washington
Model Conservation Program 6.149
Jim Perich-Anderson, Tacoma Public Utilities
Linda Dethman, Dethman and Associates

DSM Resource Acquisition and Market Transformation: Two Inconsistent Policy
Objectives? 6.157
Ralph Prahl, Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
Jeff Schlegel, Wisconsin Energy Conservation Corporation

Bridging the Gap Between Research and Market Acceptance: One State
Agency's Commercialization Program
6.167
Sam Rashkin, California Energy Commission

Performance Contracting for Low Income Conservation 6.175
Anthony F. Riordan, Jr., SESCO, Inc.

Persistence of Savings in New Multifamily Buildings 6.185
Marc A. Schuldt, SBW Consulting, Inc.
Pamela Brandis, Bonneville Power Administration
David I. Lerman, Tacoma Public Utilities

The Future of Integrated Resource Planning in Competitive Energy Markets 6.191
Connie Smyser, Electric Power Research Institute

Barriers and Incentives for Utility Energy Efficiency Programs in Deregulated
Markets 6.201
Joel N. Swisher, UNEP Collaborating Centre, Risø National Lab

Regulation Versus Competition: Which Leads to the Most Energy Efficiency? 6.213
Rick Tempchin, Edison Electric Institute
William LeBlanc, Barakat & Chamberlin, Inc.
Steven Wu, Stanford University

Incentives and Standard to Promote Economic and Energy Efficiency 6.221
Bruce N. True, California Energy Commission

Addressing Uncertainty and the Value of Flexibility in the Second Generation of IRP 6.231
Daniel M. Violette and Linda K. Olsson, XENERGY, Inc.

Will Retail Competition "Kill" IRP and DSM? 6.241
W. Michael Warwick, Pacific Northwest Laboratory
Susan V. Bailey, Bonneville Power Administration

The Impact of Power Sector Restructuring on Building Energy Efficiency: The Roles
of IRP and DSM 6.251
Stephen Wiel, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory

Utility Deregulation and Retail Wheeling: The Stakes for IRP and DSM 6.263
Dan W. York, MSB Energy Associates, Inc.
Armond Cohen, Conservation Law Foundation

Back to: 1994 Summer Study