Pollution Lineup: An Environmental Ranking of
Automakers
Candace Morey, Roland Hwang, Jim Kliesch, John DeCicco
The research reported for this report was conducted by The Union
of Concerned Scientists and the ACEEE
March, 2000
Despite three decades of emissions regulations, cars and light trucks --
a category that includes sport utility vehicles, minivans, and pickups --
still threaten Americans health and the environment. Yet automakers
seek to distinguish themselves as environmentally responsible companies through
advertising as well as voluntary actions to reduce pollution from their vehicles,
increase recycled materials content, and sell advanced-technology vehicles.
At the same time, almost all automakers are trying hard to sell greater numbers
of sport utility vehicles (SUVs) and other light trucks, which pollute far
more than passenger cars.
Determining which automakers truly qualify as environmental leaders requires
an objective comparison of the pollution performance of their products. This
study compares automakers new passenger vehicles on the basis of their
smog-forming and global warming emissions. We evaluated vehicles sold in
1998 (the most recent year for which complete data are available) using
information from the Environmental Protection Agency, the California Air
Resources Board, and the National Highway and Transportation Safety
Administration. Our study also indicates the most important steps automakers
and policymakers can take to reduce the environmental impacts of new automobiles.
Key Results
This study demonstrates that pollution from automakers new vehicles
varies significantly (see figure ES-1). Causes of these differences are outlined
below.
Light Trucks Damage the Big 3's Rankings
The "Big 3" (DaimlerChrysler, Ford, and General Motors) account for 85 percent
of light truck sales in the United States, which puts them into our "worst
polluters" category. Although recently adopted regulations will require light
trucks to meet the same tailpipe standards as cars, nearly a decade will
pass before they are completely phased in. In addition, the Corporate Average
Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards allow light trucks to consume one-third more
gasoline than cars. Fuel economy is directly related to emissions of carbon
dioxide (CO2), the primary global warming gas, and fuel-inefficient
trucks emit more CO2 than cars. Technologies can make light trucks
as clean and fuel-efficient as cars today, but unless the Big 3 build them
into vehicles soon, they will continue to lag behind the average pollution
performance of the industry (see table).
Figure ES-1
Automaker Pollution Rankings for Average New Vehicle
Smog-Forming and Global Warming Emissions |
 |
a. Automakers with annual sales greater than 100,000 vehicles
b. Daimler Chrysler includes Chrysler and Mercedes vehicles.
c. Ford includes Mazda and Volvo. |
| Average Smog-Forming and Global Warming Emissions by Automaker (grams
per mile)(a) |
 |
a. This table provides detailed results from our study on the relative
pollution from automakers cars andtrucks, for both smog-forming and
global warming emissions.
b. Nitrogen oxides (NOx) and hydrocarbons (HC) are the two major smog-forming
pollutants from motor vehicles.
c. Calculated based on fuel economy values (see appendix). Fuel economy is
directly related to emissions of carbon dioxidevehicles that use more
gasoline emit more global warming gases.
d. Indicates the automaker does not sell this type of vehicle.
e. DaimlerChrysler includes Chrysler and Mercedes vehicles. Ford includes
Mazda and Volvo. |
Sales of Fuel-Efficient, Low-Emissions Vehicles Secure Hondas
Ranking.
Hondas vehicles achieve the lowest emissions of both smog-forming and
global warming gases. Honda was the first automaker to sell a significant
portion of its vehicles as low-emission vehicles (LEVs) -- a standard that
is 57 percent more stringent than the current national requirement. Honda
also leads the nation in fuel efficiency, with cars averaging the industry
best at 31.8 miles per gallon. Finally, Honda benefits from selling a relatively
small fraction of light trucks (10 percent of its sales), and those trucks
are among the cleanest and most fuel-efficient in the industry.
The Auto Industry Is Backsliding on Global Warming.
Historic fuel-economy data reveals a disturbing trend -- every automakers
average new vehicles emit more global warming gases today than ten years
ago, with the exception of BMW.1 In 1999, US fuel economy overall dropped
to its lowest value in 20 years. Two decades of fuel-saving technologies
that could have helped curb CO2 emissions have instead gone into increasing
vehicle weight and performance.
The Big 3 Account for Most Global-Warming Emissions from New Vehicles.
The Big 3 sell the dirtiest vehicles and capture the vast majority of US
passenger vehicle sales, making them the worst polluters by any measure.
Together, Daimler Chrysler, Ford, and General Motors vehicles are the
source of 76 percent of the CO2 emitted by vehicles sold in 1998.
Immediate action by these automakers to raise the fuel economy of their light
trucks would significantly reduce global warming emissions from new automobiles.
Key Recommendations
What Automakers Can Do.
"Green" competition will never fully replace the need for public policies,
but it can help accelerate the introduction of cleaner technologies. Automakers
wishing to distinguish themselves as environmental leaders must make their
light trucks meet the same emissions and fuel economy standards as cars within
the next five years or sooner. If Ford had taken these steps, it would have
been the second-cleanest automaker in our rankings.
Environmentally concerned automakers must lower the total pollution from
their new vehicles each year. Introducing cleaner gasoline vehicles ahead
of mandates will help. Cooperating with policymakers to develop stronger
fuel economy standards is essential. Finally, automakers must begin selling
advanced technology vehicles, which hold the promise to eliminate automobiles
from the pollution picture.
Policymakers Must Act Now.
Regulators have taken steps to slowly close tailpipe pollution loopholes
for light trucks, but they continue to disregard fuel-saving technologies
for trucks by retaining the CAFE loophole. Holding light trucks to the same
fuel economy standards as cars is the most effective step we can take to
cut global warming emissions. The CAFE loophole alone allowed an extra 237
million tons of CO2 to enter our atmosphere last year.
28 pp., $15.00, T003