Full Site
Publications
Energy Policy
Programs
Press and Media
Consumer Resources
Publications and Meetings
Support
 

Senate CAFE Legislative Proposals — June 2007


Two proposals for increasing automakers' corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) requirements are currently under discussion in the Senate. These proposals differ substantially in the oil savings reductions they offer. The oil savings potential of each proposal relative to a business-as-usual baseline is shown in Table 1 below.

Table 1. Annual Oil Savings Potential of Proposed Legislation (million barrels per day)
 
2015
2020
2025
2030
Senate Energy Bill
0 – 0.3
0 – 1.1
0 – 2.4
0 – 3.8
Levin amendment
-0.02
0.3
0.9
1.5


Legislative Summaries

  • The underlying energy bill (S.AMDT.1502 to H.R.6) calls for a target fuel economy standard of 35 MPG by 2020, with a 4% per year increase in subsequent years. In this bill, the setting of actual standards is left to the discretion of the Department of Transportation for all years, and thus oil savings associated with this policy are uncertain. The bill includes mandates for auto manufacturers to greatly increase their production of flexible-fuel vehicles.

  • Senators Levin, Pryor, Bond, Voinovich, Stabenow and McCaskill have offered an amendment that calls for a passenger car target of 36 MPG by 2022 and light truck target of 30 MPG by 2025, with lower fuel economy targets in certain early years. This amendment does not allow for "off-ramps," ensuring that some savings will be achieved, yet the savings from the Levin proposal are much lower than those of the Senate energy bill; as Figure 1 shows, the difference in potential savings reaches 2.3 million barrels per day in 2030.

    The amendment also extends the "flex-fuel vehicle loophole" in current CAFE law through 2020. This loophole allows manufacturers to take credit toward fuel economy requirements for manufacturing vehicles that can run on ethanol, but rarely do. This, in effect, allows manufacturers to meet a lower fuel economy standard. The Levin amendment's extension of the flex-fuel vehicle loophole significantly lowers its oil savings potential. In conjunction with the weaker targets and timeline, this proposal offers less than half of the savings potential offered by the Senate energy bill.
Figure 1. Projected U.S. Oil Consumption Associated with Senate CAFE Proposals

Note: Dotted lines reflect maximum oil savings; actual savings could be considerably smaller.

The Levin amendment also mandates aggressive production of "advanced vehicle technologies," a category that it defines as hybrids, diesels, fuel cell vehicles, electric vehicles, and flex-fuel vehicles. Because flex-fuel vehicles are by far the lowest-cost of these options to automakers, this policy in effect allows automakers to take fuel economy credits for technologies whose production is mandated.


For more information contact:
Therese Langer, Program Director
Shruti Vaidyanathan, Research Assistant

Top of Page 

 
Energy Policy | Programs | Press & Media | Consumer Resources
Publications & Meetings | Support ACEEE | Site Map | Home

© American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
All Rights Reserved.
Read our Copyright and Permission requests information.
Read our privacy guidelines. Contact us.